How To Combat Conscious And Unconscious Bias At Work

LINKS TO CONTENT
ToggleBias, whether conscious or unconscious, significantly influences our behaviours and decisions in the workplace. Conscious bias, or explicit bias, involves deliberate prejudices that individuals are aware of. These show up as overt discrimination or favouritism based on race, gender, or other characteristics. In contrast, unconscious bias, or implicit bias, consists of automatic, unintentional attitudes or stereotypes. These attitudes affect our understanding, actions, and decisions.
These biases operate without our conscious awareness, often manifesting in subtle ways that can nevertheless have profound impacts on organisational dynamics and equity. This article explores both types of bias, examining their manifestations, underlying mechanisms, particularly the neuroscience behind unconscious bias, and strategies organisations can implement to mitigate their effects and foster a more inclusive workplace.
Conscious bias, also known as explicit bias, refers to the attitudes and beliefs we hold at a conscious level. These biases are deliberate, and individuals are usually aware of them. They can manifest in several ways in the workplace:
To combat conscious bias, organisations can implement several strategies:
Organisations must be aware of the legal implications of conscious bias. Failing to address it can result in:
Unconscious bias affects various aspects of workplace dynamics, including hiring, promotion, and daily interactions. Here are some key impacts:
Unconscious biases are automatic, mental shortcuts used to process information quickly. These biases are deeply rooted in the brain’s structure and function:
Organisations can take several steps to mitigate the impact of unconscious bias:
For many years, unconscious bias training was the go-to remedy to combat discrimination in the workplace. However, this type of training is increasingly being discredited for several reasons:
Research has shown that unconscious bias training often does not result in long-term changes in behaviour or improve workplace equality. A report by the UK Government Equalities Office found that while such training might raise awareness, it does not lead to sustained behavioural change or increased representation of minority groups in the workplace. It also highlighted potential negative consequences, such as reinforcing stereotypes and provoking backlash (GOV.UK).
The IAT, which is commonly used in unconscious bias training, has been heavily criticised for its validity and reliability. Critics argue that the IAT measures reaction times rather than true bias, and its results are not consistently replicable. There is also debate over whether the IAT accurately measures unconscious biases or simply reflects learned associations that do not necessarily translate into discriminatory behaviour (Psychology Today).
There is evidence suggesting that unconscious bias training can sometimes backfire. For instance, it might create resentment among participants, particularly if the training is mandatory or perceived as accusatory. Moreover, some studies indicate that such training can entrench stereotypes rather than dismantle them.
There is no universally accepted definition of unconscious bias, and the effectiveness of the training programs is highly contested. Different studies and articles provide varying definitions and outcomes, contributing to the controversy and scepticism surrounding the training’s efficacy (Psychology Today).
Both conscious and unconscious biases are inevitable in the workplace, influencing decisions and behaviours in subtle and overt ways. While conscious bias involves intentional prejudices, unconscious bias operates automatically without our awareness, often rooted in deep-seated stereotypes and past experiences. Recognising the presence of these biases is the first step towards mitigating their effects. Organisations can combat bias through comprehensive strategies such as awareness training, implementing standardised processes, promoting diversity and inclusion, and ensuring accountability. By taking these proactive measures, companies can foster a more equitable and inclusive workplace, ultimately enhancing organisational performance and employee satisfaction.